e10vq
FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ___ to ___
|
|
|
For Quarter Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
Commission File Number: 0-10140 |
CVB FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
California
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
|
|
95-3629339
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
701 North Haven Ave, Suite 350, Ontario, California
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
91764
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
|
|
(909) 980-4030 |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, or a
non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Number of shares of common stock of the registrant: 76,495,148 outstanding as of May 4, 2006.
CVB FINANCIAL CORP.
2006 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CVB FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
Dollar amounts in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
2,406,986 |
|
|
$ |
2,369,892 |
|
Interest-bearing balances due from depository institutions |
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
1,883 |
|
Investment in stock of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) |
|
|
72,362 |
|
|
|
70,770 |
|
Loans and lease finance receivables |
|
|
2,717,127 |
|
|
|
2,663,863 |
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(23,584 |
) |
|
|
(23,204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
5,174,675 |
|
|
|
5,083,204 |
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
131,453 |
|
|
|
130,141 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
41,258 |
|
|
|
40,020 |
|
Intangibles |
|
|
11,886 |
|
|
|
12,474 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
31,531 |
|
|
|
32,357 |
|
Cash value life insurance |
|
|
72,633 |
|
|
|
71,811 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
25,825 |
|
|
|
24,147 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
29,428 |
|
|
|
18,420 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
9,225 |
|
|
|
10,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
5,527,914 |
|
|
$ |
5,422,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
1,362,022 |
|
|
$ |
1,490,613 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
2,114,059 |
|
|
|
1,933,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
3,476,081 |
|
|
|
3,424,046 |
|
Demand Note to U.S. Treasury |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
6,433 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
1,245,000 |
|
|
|
916,000 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
305,000 |
|
|
|
580,000 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
12,189 |
|
|
|
15,047 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
8,679 |
|
|
|
7,102 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
108,250 |
|
|
|
82,476 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
32,214 |
|
|
|
48,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
5,188,349 |
|
|
|
5,080,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (authorized, 20,000,000 shares
without par; none issued or outstanding) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (authorized, 122,070,312 shares
without par; issued and outstanding
76,479,277 (2006) and 76,430,206 (2005)) |
|
|
253,302 |
|
|
|
252,717 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
114,850 |
|
|
|
103,546 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(28,587 |
) |
|
|
(13,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
339,565 |
|
|
|
342,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
5,527,914 |
|
|
$ |
5,422,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
CVB FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(unaudited)
Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
44,292 |
|
|
$ |
32,380 |
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
20,737 |
|
|
|
18,703 |
|
Tax-preferred |
|
|
6,245 |
|
|
|
4,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income |
|
|
26,982 |
|
|
|
22,790 |
|
Dividends from FHLB stock |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with other institutions |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
72,132 |
|
|
|
55,683 |
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
13,201 |
|
|
|
5,061 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
10,369 |
|
|
|
1,964 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
6,724 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
28,307 |
|
|
|
15,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income before provision for credit losses |
|
|
43,825 |
|
|
|
40,624 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for credit losses |
|
|
43,575 |
|
|
|
40,624 |
|
Other operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
3,291 |
|
|
|
3,042 |
|
Financial Advisory services |
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
Bankcard services |
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
BOLI income |
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other operating income |
|
|
7,729 |
|
|
|
7,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
12,720 |
|
|
|
12,833 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
1,745 |
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
Stationary and supplies |
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
Promotion |
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
1,796 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
(503 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other operating expenses |
|
|
23,470 |
|
|
|
20,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
27,834 |
|
|
|
27,319 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
9,594 |
|
|
|
9,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
18,240 |
|
|
$ |
17,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
CVB FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Income (Loss), |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Net of Tax |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
(amounts and shares in thousands) |
|
Balance December 31, 2004 |
|
|
60,666 |
|
|
$ |
236,277 |
|
|
$ |
72,314 |
|
|
$ |
8,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-for-4 stock split |
|
|
15,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(676 |
) |
|
|
(863 |
) |
|
|
(11,423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for acquisition of
Granite State Bank |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
13,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends ($0.42 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
70,618 |
|
Other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on securities
available-for-sale, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,278 |
) |
|
|
(22,278 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2005 |
|
|
76,430 |
|
|
|
252,717 |
|
|
|
103,546 |
|
|
|
(13,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based Compensation Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends ($0.09 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,936 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,240 |
|
Other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on securities
available-for-sale, net of taxes $11,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,201 |
) |
|
|
(15,201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2006 |
|
|
76,479 |
|
|
$ |
253,302 |
|
|
$ |
114,850 |
|
|
$ |
(28,587 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Income (Loss), |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Net of Tax |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
(amounts and shares in thousands) |
|
Balance December 31, 2004 |
|
|
60,666 |
|
|
|
236,277 |
|
|
|
72,314 |
|
|
|
8,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for acquisition of
Granite State Bank |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
13,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends ($0.11 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,701 |
|
Other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on securities
available-for-sale, net of taxes $13,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,039 |
) |
|
|
(19,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2005 |
|
|
61,667 |
|
|
$ |
252,000 |
|
|
$ |
82,378 |
|
|
$ |
(10,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(amounts and shares in thousands) |
|
Disclosure of reclassification amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on securities arising during the period |
|
$ |
(26,209 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,826 |
) |
Tax benefit |
|
|
11,008 |
|
|
|
13,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss on securities |
|
$ |
(15,201 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5
CVB FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received |
|
$ |
71,825 |
|
|
$ |
55,483 |
|
Service charges and other fees received |
|
|
7,724 |
|
|
|
7,079 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
(31,165 |
) |
|
|
(15,358 |
) |
Cash paid to suppliers and employees |
|
|
(24,128 |
) |
|
|
(19,935 |
) |
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(950 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
23,306 |
|
|
|
27,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from repayment of MBS |
|
|
82,866 |
|
|
|
96,223 |
|
Proceeds from repayment of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
Proceeds from maturity of investment securities |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(98,858 |
) |
|
|
(52,716 |
) |
Purchases of MBS |
|
|
(70,120 |
) |
|
|
(260,941 |
) |
Purchases of FHLB stock |
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
(4,527 |
) |
Net (increase) decrease in loans |
|
|
(51,208 |
) |
|
|
24,443 |
|
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of premises and equipment |
|
|
(2,738 |
) |
|
|
(2,650 |
) |
Cash acquired from purchase of Granite State Bank, net of cash paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,232 |
|
Investment in common stock of CVB Statutory Trust III |
|
|
(774 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(141,820 |
) |
|
|
(187,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in transaction deposits |
|
|
(56,165 |
) |
|
|
29,078 |
|
Net increase in time deposits |
|
|
108,202 |
|
|
|
9,997 |
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
Repayment of advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
|
(65,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in short-term borrowings |
|
|
113,502 |
|
|
|
50,683 |
|
Cash dividends on common stock |
|
|
(6,936 |
) |
|
|
(7,637 |
) |
Issuance of junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
25,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
Tax benefit related to exercise of stock options |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
119,826 |
|
|
|
203,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
42,713 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
130,141 |
|
|
|
84,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
131,453 |
|
|
$ |
127,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
6
CVB FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
RECONCILIATION OF NET EARNINGS TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
18,240 |
|
|
$ |
17,701 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash value of life insurance |
|
|
(822 |
) |
|
|
(954 |
) |
Net amortization of premiums on investment securities |
|
|
2,549 |
|
|
|
3,146 |
|
Provisions for credit losses |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
1,812 |
|
Change in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
(1,679 |
) |
|
|
(2,463 |
) |
Change in accrued interest payable |
|
|
(2,857 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
Change in other assets and liabilities |
|
|
4,581 |
|
|
|
8,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
5,066 |
|
|
|
9,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
$ |
23,306 |
|
|
$ |
27,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Granite State Bank: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
85,898 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,777 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,399 |
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,879 |
) |
Stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price of acquisition, net of cash received |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(12,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities purchased and not settled |
|
$ |
6,103 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
7
CVB FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accompanying condensed consolidated unaudited financial statements and notes thereto have
been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission for Form 10-Q and conform to practices within the banking industry and include all of
the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America for interim financial reporting. The results of operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements, accounting
policies and financial notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the
opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated unaudited financial statements
reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments), which are necessary for
a fair representation of financial results for the interim periods presented. A summary of the
significant accounting policies consistently applied in the preparation of the accompanying
consolidated financial statements follows.
Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of CVB Financial Corp. (the Company) and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Citizens
Business Bank (the Bank); CVB Ventures, Inc.; Chino Valley Bancorp; and ONB Bancorp after
elimination of all intercompany transactions and balances. The Company is also the common
stockholder of CVB Statutory Trust I, CVB Statutory Trust II and CVB Statutory Trust III. CVB
Statutory Trusts I and II were created in December 2003 and CVB Statutory Trust III was created in
January 2006 to issue trust preferred securities in order to raise capital for the Company. In
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities (FIN No. 46R), these trusts are not included in the consolidated
financial statements.
Nature of Operations - The Companys primary operations are related to traditional banking
activities, including the acceptance of deposits and the lending and investing of money through the
operations of the Bank. The Bank also provides automobile and equipment leasing, and brokers
mortgage loans to customers through its Golden West Financial Division and trust services to
customers through its Financial Advisory Services Division and Business Financial Centers (branch
offices). The Banks customers consist primarily of small to mid-sized businesses and individuals
located in San Bernardino County, Riverside County, Orange County, Madera County, Fresno County,
Tulare County, Kern County, and the eastern portion of Los Angeles County in Southern California.
The Bank operates 40 Business Financial Centers with its headquarters located in the city of
Ontario.
The Companys operating business units have been combined into two main segments:
Business Financial Centers and Treasury. Business Financial Centers (branches) comprise the loans,
deposits, products and services the Bank offers to the majority of its customers. The other
segment is Treasury Department, which manages the investment portfolio of the Company.
The internal reporting of the Company considers all business units. Funds are allocated to
each business unit based on its need to fund assets (use of funds) or its need to invest funds
(source of funds). Net income is determined based on the actual net income of the business unit
plus the allocated income or expense based on the sources and uses of funds for each business unit.
Non-interest income and non-interest expense are those items directly attributable to a business
unit.
8
Investment Securities - The Company classifies as held-to-maturity those debt
securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity. Securities
classified as trading are those securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of
selling them in the near term. All other debt and equity securities are classified as
available-for-sale. Securities held-to-maturity are accounted for at cost and adjusted for
amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Trading securities are accounted for at fair
value with the unrealized holding gains and losses being included in current earnings.
Available-for-sale securities are accounted for at fair value, with the net unrealized gains and
losses, net of income tax effects, presented as a separate component of stockholders equity. At
each reporting date, available-for-sale securities are assessed to determine whether there is an
other-than-temporary impairment. Such impairment, if any, is required to be recognized in current
earnings rather than as a separate component of stockholders equity. Realized gains and losses on
sales of securities are recognized in earnings at the time of sale and are determined on a
specific-identification basis. Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income
using the interest method over the life of the security. For mortgage-related securities (i.e.,
securities that are collateralized and payments received from underlying mortgage) the amortization
or accretion is based on the estimated average lives of the securities. The Companys investment in
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock is carried at cost. At March 31, 2006, all of the Companys
investment securities are classified as available-for-sale.
Loans and Lease Finance Receivables - Loans and lease finance receivables are reported at the
principal amount outstanding, less deferred net loan origination fees. Interest on loans and lease
finance receivables is credited to income based on the principal amount outstanding. Interest
income is not recognized on loans and lease finance receivables when collection of interest is
deemed by management to be doubtful. In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into
commitments to extend credit to its customers. These commitments are not reflected in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. As of March 31, 2006, the Company had entered into
commitments with certain customers amounting to $972.5 million compared to $895.8 million at
December 31, 2005. Letters of credit at March 31, 2006, and December 31, 2005, were $67.5 million
and $68.9 million, respectively.
The Bank receives collateral to support loans, lease finance receivables, and commitments to
extend credit for which collateral is deemed necessary. The most significant categories of
collateral are real estate, principally commercial and industrial income-producing properties, real
estate mortgages, and assets utilized in agribusiness.
Nonrefundable fees and direct costs associated with the origination or purchase of loans are
deferred and netted against outstanding loan balances. The deferred net loan fees and costs are
recognized in interest income over the loan term in a manner that approximates the level-yield
method.
Provision and Allowance for Credit Losses - The determination of the balance in the allowance
for credit losses is based on an analysis of the loan and lease finance receivables portfolio using
a systematic methodology and reflects an amount that, in managements
judgment, is adequate to provide for probable credit losses inherent in the portfolio, after
giving consideration to the character of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions, past
credit loss experience, and such other factors as deserve current recognition in estimating
inherent credit losses. The estimate is reviewed periodically by management and various regulatory
entities and, as adjustments become necessary, they are reported in earnings in the periods in
which they become known. The provision for credit losses is charged to expense. During the first
quarter of 2006, the Company recorded $250,000 provision for credit losses. The allowance for
credit losses was $23.6 million as of March 31, 2006. This represents an increase of $380,000 when
compared with an allowance for credit losses of $23.2 million as of December 31, 2005. The
increase was primarily due to the provision for credit losses of $250,000 and the loan recoveries
of $150,000, offset by the charge-off loans of $20,000 during the first quarter of 2006.
A loan for which collection of principal and interest according to its original terms is not
probable is considered to be impaired. The Companys policy is to record a specific valuation
allowance, which is
9
included in the allowance for credit losses, or charge off that portion of an
impaired loan that exceeds its fair value. Fair value is usually based on the value of underlying
collateral.
There were no loans classified as impaired at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. A loan is
impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be
unable to collect all amounts (contractual interest and principal) according to the contractual
terms of the loan agreement.
Premises and Equipment - Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated
depreciation, which is provided for in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets
to operations over their estimated service lives using the straight-line method. Properties under
capital lease and leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of estimated economic lives
of 15 years or the initial terms of the leases. Estimated lives are 3 to 5 years for computer and
equipment, 5 to 7 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment, and 15 to 40 years for buildings and
improvements. Long-lived assets are reviewed periodically for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The impairment is
calculated as the difference between the expected undiscounted future cash flows of a long-lived
asset, if lower, and its carrying value. The impairment loss, if any, would be recorded in
noninterest expense.
Other Real Estate Owned - Other real estate owned represents real estate acquired through
foreclosure in satisfaction of commercial and real estate loans and is stated at fair value, minus
estimated costs to sell (fair value at time of foreclosure). Loan balances in excess of fair value
of the real estate acquired at the date of acquisition are charged against the allowance for credit
losses. Any subsequent operating expenses or income, reduction in estimated values, and gains or
losses on disposition of such properties are charged to current operations. There is no other real
estate owned at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
Business Combinations and Intangible Assets The Company has engaged in the acquisition of
financial institutions and the assumption of deposits and purchase of assets from other financial
institutions in its market area. The Company has paid premiums on certain transactions, and such
premiums are recorded as intangible assets, in the form of goodwill or other intangible assets. In
accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
goodwill is not being amortized whereas identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are
amortized over their useful lives. On an annual basis, the Company tests goodwill and intangible
assets for impairment.
Additionally, as required by SFAS No. 142, the Company completed its annual impairment test as
of June 30, 2005 and did not record any impairment of goodwill. At March 31, 2006 goodwill was
$31.5 million (net of amortization of $5.4 million recorded prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142).
As of March 31, 2006, intangible assets that continue to be subject to amortization include core
deposits of $11.9 million (net of $7.8 million of accumulated amortization). During the first
quarter of 2006, the Company finalized the goodwill analysis for the Granite State Bank acquisition
and adjusted goodwill in the amount of $826,000 to record additional purchase price adjustment
related to the acquisition. Amortization expense for such intangible assets was $588,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2006. Estimated amortization expense, for the remainder of 2006 is
expected to be $1.76 million. Estimated amortization expense, for the succeeding five fiscal years
is $2.35 million for year one and year two, $1.75 million for year three, $1.70 million for year
four and $1.60 million for year five. The weighted average remaining life of intangible assets is
approximately 4.8 years.
Income Taxes - Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years
of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting
amounts at each year-end, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the
periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.
10
Earnings per Common Share - Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing income available
to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each
period. The computation of diluted earnings per common share considers the number of shares
issuable upon the assumed exercise of outstanding common stock options. Share and per share amounts
have been retroactively restated to give effect to all stock dividends and splits. The actual
number of shares outstanding at March 31, 2006 was 76,479,277. The table below presents the
reconciliation of earnings per share for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share Reconciliation |
|
|
|
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Average Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Average Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to
common stockholders |
|
$ |
18,240 |
|
|
|
76,460 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
17,701 |
|
|
|
76,393 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE
SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental shares
from assumed exercise
of outstanding options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to
common stockholders |
|
$ |
18,240 |
|
|
|
77,081 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
17,701 |
|
|
|
77,163 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation - At March 31, 2006, the Company has three stock-based employee
compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 15 in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), using the modified prospective method. Under this method,
awards that are granted, modified, or settled after December 31, 2005, are measured and accounted
for in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. Also under this method, unvested stock awards as of December
31, 2005 are recognized over the remaining service period with no change in historical reported
earnings. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company accounted for stock compensation
under the intrinsic value method permitted by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB No. 25) and related interpretations. Accordingly,
the Company previously recognized no compensation cost for employee stock options that were granted
with an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of
grant. The Company provided pro forma disclosure amounts in accordance with SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (SFAS No. 148), as if the
fair value method defined by SFAS No. 123 had been applied to its stock-based compensation.
As a result of adopting SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006, the net income for the three months
ended March 31, 2006, was $118,000 lower than if the Company had continued to account for
stock-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25. There was no impact on earnings per share.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company presented all tax benefits of deductions
resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows. SFAS 123R requires the tax benefits resulting from deductions in excess of the
compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) to be classified as
financing cash flows. The Company has $82,000 of excess tax benefit resulting from disqualified
position classified as financing activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
three months ended March 31, 2006.
11
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share had the
Company accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123R for the three months
ended March 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
17,701 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based method for all
awards, net of related tax effects |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
17,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Basic pro forma |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
Diluted as reported |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Diluted pro forma |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
The estimated fair value of the options granted during 2006 and prior years was
calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. There were 32,000 options granted during
the first three months of 2006. No options were granted during the same period in 2005. The fair
value of each stock option granted in 2006 was estimated on the date of grant using the following
weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Dividend Yield |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
Volatility |
|
|
40.1 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Expected life |
|
6.7 years |
Option activity under the
Companys stock option plan as of March 31, 2006 and changes
during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Value |
|
Options |
|
(000) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term (in Years) |
|
|
($000) |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
$ |
9.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
32 |
|
|
$ |
17.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
49 |
|
|
$ |
7.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
83 |
|
|
$ |
12.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
$ |
9.40 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
|
|
$ |
13,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested shares at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
635 |
|
|
$ |
13.23 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
2,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
$ |
7.26 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
$ |
11,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Value |
|
Options |
|
(000) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term (in Years) |
|
|
($000) |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2005 |
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
$ |
7.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
407 |
|
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
8.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2005 |
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
$ |
8.65 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
|
|
$ |
11,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested shares at March 31, 2005 |
|
|
923 |
|
|
$ |
11.09 |
|
|
|
6.87 |
|
|
$ |
3,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
|
|
4.76 |
|
|
$ |
8,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the three months
ended March 31, 2006 was $6.93. There were no options granted during the three months ended March
31, 2005. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended March 31,
2006 and 2005 was $442,000 and $4.97 million, respectively. SFAS 123R requires an estimate of
forfeitures be used in the calculation. The Company estimates its forfeiture rates based on its
historical experience.
A summary of the status of the Companys nonvested shares as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, and
changes during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, is presented below:
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average Fair |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average Fair |
|
Nonvested Shares |
|
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
(000) |
|
|
Value |
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
764 |
|
|
$ |
4.54 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
$ |
3.81 |
|
Granted |
|
|
32 |
|
|
$ |
6.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
$ |
1.96 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
$ |
4.25 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
1.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
635 |
|
|
$ |
4.71 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
$ |
3.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2006, there was $1.64 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to nonvested shares-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is expected
to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 4.5 years. The total fair value of
shares vested during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $187,000 and $174,000,
respectively.
As
of March 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company has 4,111,767 and 4,160,900, respectively, shares of
common stock available for granting of future options under the May 2000 Plan.
Statement of Cash Flows - Cash and cash equivalents as reported in the statements of cash
flows include cash and due from banks and fed funds sold. Cash flows from loans and deposits are
reported net.
Trust Services - The Company maintains funds in trust for customers. The amount of these funds
and the related liability have not been recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
because they are not assets or liabilities of the Bank or Company, with the exception of any funds
held on deposit with the Bank.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements - The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - In March 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) staff issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities (SFAS No. 156). SFAS No. 156 requires all separately recognized
servicing assets and liabilities to be initially measured at fair value. In addition, entities are
permitted to choose to either subsequently measure servicing rights at fair value and report
changes in fair value in earnings, or amortize servicing rights in proportion to and over the
estimated net servicing income or loss and assess the rights for impairment. Beginning with the
fiscal year in which an entity adopts SFAS No. 156, it may elect to subsequently measure a class of
servicing assets and liabilities at fair value. Post adoption, an entity may make this election as
of the beginning of any fiscal year. An entity that elects to subsequently measure a class of
servicing assets and liabilities at fair value should apply that election to all new and existing
recognized servicing assets and liabilities within that class. The effect of remeasuring an
existing class of servicing assets and liabilities at fair value is to be reported as a
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption.
SFAS No. 156 is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins after
September 15, 2006. The statement also requires additional disclosures. The Company does not expect
the adoption of SFAS No. 156 to have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
Reclassification - Certain amounts in the prior periods financial statements and related
footnote disclosures have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
13
During the first quarter of 2006, we reclassified the consolidated statements of earnings for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 by reducing $313,000 from Loans, including fees and
reducing the same amount from Salaries and employee benefits. This reclassification did not have
any impact to our net earnings; however, it reduced our net interest income by $313,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2005. As a result, our net interest margin tax equivalent for the
first three months ended March 31, 2005 reduced from 3.99% as reported previously to 3.96% as
restated in this current report.
Shareholder Rights Plan - In 2000, the Company adopted a shareholder rights plan designed to
maximize long-term value and to protect shareholders from improper takeover tactics and takeover
bids which are not fair to all shareholders. In accordance with the plan, preferred share purchase
rights were distributed as a dividend at the rate of one right to purchase one one-thousandth of a
share of the Companys Series A Participating Preferred Stock at an initial exercise price of
$50.00 (subject to adjustment as described in the terms of the plan) upon the occurrence of certain
triggering events. For additional information concerning this plan, see Note 11 to Consolidated
Financial Statements, Commitments and Contingencies contained in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Other Contingencies - In the ordinary course of business, the Company becomes involved in
litigation. Based upon the Companys internal records and discussions with legal counsel, the
Company records reserves for estimates of the probable outcome of all cases brought against them.
Business Segments - The Company is a community bank with our Business Financial Centers
(branches) being the focal points for customer sales and services. As such, these Business
Financial Centers comprise the biggest segment of the Company. The next largest business unit is
the Treasury Department. This department manages all of the investments for the Company.
The following table represents the selected financial information for these two business
segments. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America do not have an
authoritative body of knowledge regarding the management accounting used in presenting these
numbers. The accounting policies for each of the business units is the same as those policies
identified for the consolidated Company and identified in the footnote on the summary of
significant accounting policies. The income numbers represent the actual income and expenses of
each business unit. In addition, each segment has allocated income and expenses based on
managements internal reporting system, which allows management to determine the performance of
each of its business units. Loan fees are the actual loan fees paid to the Company by its
customers and these fees are not deferred as they are for the consolidated financial statements.
All income and expense items not directly associated with the two business segments are grouped in
the Other category. Future changes in the Companys management structure or reporting
methodologies may result in changes in the measurement of operating segment results.
The following tables present the operating results and other key financial measures for the
individual operating segments for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005:
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Centers |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
33,552 |
|
|
$ |
27,840 |
|
|
$ |
10,740 |
|
|
$ |
72,132 |
|
Credit for funds provided |
|
|
16,532 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
17,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
50,084 |
|
|
|
27,840 |
|
|
|
11,886 |
|
|
|
89,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9,721 |
|
|
|
16,564 |
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
28,307 |
|
Charge for funds used |
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
7,065 |
|
|
|
9,023 |
|
|
|
17,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
11,311 |
|
|
|
23,629 |
|
|
|
11,045 |
|
|
|
45,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
38,773 |
|
|
$ |
4,211 |
|
|
$ |
841 |
|
|
$ |
43,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
7,729 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
10,012 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
13,464 |
|
|
|
23,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment pretax profit |
|
$ |
32,461 |
|
|
$ |
3,979 |
|
|
-$ |
8,606 |
|
|
$ |
27,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets as of March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
3,211,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,822,703 |
|
|
$ |
493,866 |
|
|
$ |
5,527,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Centers |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
25,518 |
|
|
$ |
23,303 |
|
|
$ |
6,862 |
|
|
$ |
55,683 |
|
Credit for funds provided |
|
|
7,457 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
7,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
32,975 |
|
|
|
23,303 |
|
|
|
7,096 |
|
|
|
63,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
9,965 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
15,059 |
|
Charge for funds used |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
5,029 |
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
7,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
4,508 |
|
|
|
14,994 |
|
|
|
3,248 |
|
|
|
22,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
28,467 |
|
|
$ |
8,309 |
|
|
$ |
3,848 |
|
|
$ |
40,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
4,377 |
|
|
|
7,079 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
8,889 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
11,198 |
|
|
|
20,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment pretax profit |
|
$ |
22,263 |
|
|
$ |
8,029 |
|
|
-$ |
2,973 |
|
|
$ |
27,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets as of March 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
2,859,149 |
|
|
$ |
1,570,302 |
|
|
$ |
402,542 |
|
|
$ |
4,831,993 |
|
15
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
Managements discussion and analysis is written to provide greater insight into the results of
operations and the financial condition of CVB Financial Corp. and its subsidiaries. Throughout this
discussion, Company refers to CVB Financial Corp. and its subsidiaries as a consolidated entity.
CVB refers to CVB Financial Corp. as the unconsolidated parent company and Bank refers to
Citizens Business Bank. For a more complete understanding of the Company and its operations,
reference should be made to the financial statements included in this report and in the Companys
2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain statements in this Report on Form 10-Q constitute
forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 which
involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ significantly from the results
discussed in such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include,
but are not limited to, economic conditions, competition in the geographic and business areas in
which we conduct operations, natural disasters, fluctuations in interest rates, credit quality, and
government regulations. For additional information concerning these factors, see the periodic
filings the Company makes with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and in particular Item 1A.
Risk Factors contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005. The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims, any obligation to update any
forward looking statements to reflect the occurrence of events or circumstances after the date of
such statements. Additionally, our financial results and operations may be affected by competition
which has manifested itself with increased pricing pressures for loans and deposits, thus
compressing our net interest margin. Because of the pressure on the net interest margin, other
operating income has become a more important element in the total revenue of the Company.
OVERVIEW
We are a bank holding company with one bank subsidiary, Citizens Business Bank. We have three
other inactive subsidiaries: CVB Ventures, Inc.; Chino Valley Bancorp and ONB Bancorp. In March
2006, we merged two of our operating subsidiaries, Community Trust Deed Services and Golden West
Enterprises, Inc. into the Bank to increase the lending limit of Golden Wests leasing operations
and to improve efficiency. We are also the common stockholder of CVB Statutory Trust I, CVB
Statutory Trust II and CVB Statutory Trust III. CVB Statutory Trust I and II were created in
December 2003 and CVB Statutory Trust III was created in January 2006 to issue $25 million trust
preferred securities in order to increase the capital of the Company. We are based in Ontario,
California in what is known as the Inland Empire. Our geographical market area encompasses Madera
(the middle of the Central Valley) in the center of California to Laguna Beach (in Orange County)
in the southern portion of California. Our mission is to offer the finest financial products and
services to professionals and businesses in our market area.
Our primary source of income is from the interest earned on our loans and investments and our
primary area of expense is the interest paid on deposits, borrowings, salaries and benefits. As
such our net income is subject to fluctuations in interest rates and their impact on our income
statement. We believe the recent rise in interest rates may relieve some of the pressure on our net
interest margin. We are also subject to competition from other financial institutions, which may
affect our pricing of products and services, and the fees and interest rates we can charge on them.
See the Risk Management section of this Item 2.
Economic conditions in our California service area impact our business. The economy of this
area has not experienced the decline that other areas of the state and country have witnessed
during the past few years. The job market continues to strengthen in the Central Valley and Inland
Empire. However, we
16
are still subject
to any changes in the economy in our market area. We benefit from construction growth
in Southern California since we provide construction loans to builders. Southern California is
experiencing growth in construction on single-family residences and commercial buildings, and our
balance sheet at March 31, 2006 reflects that growth from December 31, 2005.
Our growth in loans and investments compared with the first quarter of 2005 has allowed our interest income to grow. The Bank has always had an excellent base of interest free deposits due primarily to the fact that we specialize in businesses and professionals as customers. This has allowed us to have a low cost of deposits, currently 1.55% for the first quarter of 2006.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our most critical accounting policies upon which our financial condition depends, and which involve the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments are as follows:
Allowance for Credit Losses: Arriving at an appropriate level of allowance for credit losses involves a high degree of judgment. Our allowance for credit losses provides for probable losses based upon evaluations of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. The determination of the balance in the allowance for credit losses is based on an analysis of the loan and lease finance receivables portfolio using a systematic methodology and reflects an amount that, in our judgment, is adequate to provide for probable credit losses inherent in the portfolio, after giving consideration to the character of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions, past credit loss experience, and such other factors as deserve current recognition in estimating inherent credit losses. The provision for credit losses is charged to expense. During the first quarter of 2006, we recorded $250,000 provision for credit losses. For a ful
l discussion of our methodology of assessing the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses, see the Risk Management section of this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Investment Portfolio: The investment portfolio is an integral part of the Companys financial performance. We invest primarily in fixed income securities. Accounting estimates are used in the presentation of the investment portfolio and these estimates do impact the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations. Many of the securities included in the investment portfolio are purchased at a premium or discount. The premiums or discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the security. For mortgage-related securities (i.e., securities that are collateralized and payments received from underlying mortgages), the amortization or accretion is based on estimated average lives of the securities. The lives of these securities can fluctuate based on the amount of prepayments received on the underlying collateral of the securities. The amount of prepayments varies from time to time based on
the interest rate environment (i.e., lower interest rates increase the likelihood of refinances) and the rate of turnover of the mortgages (i.e., how often the underlying properties are sold and mortgages paid-off). We use estimates for the average lives of these mortgage-related securities based on information received from third parties whose business it is to compile mortgage related data and develop a consensus of that data. We adjust the rate of amortization or accretion regularly to reflect changes in the estimated average lives of these securities.
We classify securities as held-to-maturity those debt securities that we have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity. Securities classified as trading are those securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. All other debt and equity securities are classified as available-for-sale. Securities held-to-maturity are accounted for at cost and adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Trading securities are accounted for at fair value
17
with the unrealized holding gains and losses being included in current earnings. Securities available-for-sale are accounted for at fair value, with the net unrealized gains and losses, net of income tax effects, presented as a separate component of stockholders equity. At each reporting date, available-for-sale securities are assessed to determine whether there is an other-than-temporary impairment. Such impairment, if any, is required to be recognized in current earnings rather than as a separate component of stockholders equity. Realized gains and losses on sales of securities are recognized in earnings at the time of sale and are determined on a specific-identification basis. Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities, except for mortgage-related securities as discussed in the previous paragraph. Our investment in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB
) stock is carried at cost.
Income Taxes: We account for income taxes by deferring income taxes based on estimated future tax effects of differences between the tax and book basis of assets and liabilities considering the provisions of enacted tax laws. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our balance sheets. We must also assess the likelihood that any deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and establish a valuation allowance for those assets determined to not likely be recoverable. Our judgment is required in determining the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting deferred tax assets and liabilities, including projections of future taxable income. Although we have determined a valuation allowance is not required for all deferred tax assets, there is no guarantee that these assets are realizable.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets: We have acquired entire banks and branches of banks. Those acquisitions accounted for under the purchase method of accounting have given rise to goodwill and intangible assets. We record the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair value. These fair values are arrived at by use of internal and external valuation techniques. The purchase price is allocated to the assets and liabilities, resulting in identifiable intangibles. Any excess purchase price after this allocation results in goodwill. Goodwill is tested on an annual basis for impairment.
ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings
We reported net earnings of $18.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This represented an increase of $539,000 or 3.05%, over net earnings of $17.7 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three-month period increased to $0.24 per share for 2006, compared to $0.23 per share for 2005. The annualized return on average assets was 1.35% for the first three months of 2006 compared to a return on average assets of 1.58% for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The annualized return on average equity was 20.82% for the three months ended March 31, 2006, compared to a return of 21.86% for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had no net gains or losses on sales of securities or sales of other real estate owned.
During the first quarter of 2005, we recorded income of $2.6 million from the settlement of the robbery loss which occurred in early 2004. See Item 3 Legal Proceedings of PART I in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2005 for more information. Net earnings, excluding the settlement of the robbery, totaled $16.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Net earnings of $18.2 million for the first quarter of 2006 represents an increase of $2.2 million or 13.89% when compared to the $16.0 million the first quarter 2005.
18
The following table reconciles the differences in net earnings with and without the settlement
of robbery loss in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings Reconciliation |
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
Before Income |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
Before Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes |
|
Taxes |
|
Net Earnings |
|
Taxes |
|
Income Taxes |
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
( amounts in thousands ) |
Net earnings without the settlement of robbery loss |
|
$ |
27,834 |
|
|
$ |
9,594 |
|
|
$ |
18,240 |
|
|
$ |
24,719 |
|
|
$ |
8,703 |
|
|
$ |
16,016 |
|
Settlement of robbery loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings as reported |
|
$ |
27,834 |
|
|
$ |
9,594 |
|
|
$ |
18,240 |
|
|
$ |
27,319 |
|
|
$ |
9,618 |
|
|
$ |
17,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have presented net earnings without the settlement of robbery loss to show
shareholders that the earnings from operations are unaffected by the impact of this item. We
believe this presentation allows the reader to more easily assess the results of the Companys core
operations and business.
Net Interest Income
The principal component of the Companys earnings is net interest income, which is the
difference between the interest and fees earned on loans and investments (earning assets) and the
interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds (interest-bearing liabilities). When net interest
income is expressed as a percentage of average earning assets, the result is the net interest
margin. The net interest spread is the yield on average earning assets minus the cost of average
interest-bearing liabilities. Our net interest income, interest spread, and net interest margin are
sensitive to general business and economic conditions. These conditions include short-term and
long-term interest rates, inflation, monetary supply, and the strength of the economy, in general,
and the local economies in which we conduct business. Our ability to manage the net interest income
during changing interest rate environments will have a significant impact on our overall
performance. We manage net interest income through affecting changes in the mix of
earning assets as well as the mix of interest-bearing liabilities, changes in the level of
interest-bearing liabilities in proportion to earning assets, and in the growth of earning assets.
The Companys net interest income after provision for credit losses totaled $43.6 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2006. This represented an increase of $3.0 million, or 7.26%, over
net interest income of $40.6 million for the same period in 2005. The increase in net interest
income of $3.0 million resulted from a $16.4 million increase in interest income, offset by a $13.2
million increase in interest expense and $250,000 provision of credit losses recorded in the first
quarter of 2006. The $16.4 million increase in interest income resulted from the $831.5 million
increase in average earning assets and an increase in average yield on earning assets to 5.86% for
the first three months of 2006 from 5.37% for the same period in 2005. The $13.2 million increase
in interest expense resulted from an $800.7 million increase in average interest-bearing
liabilities and an increase in the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities to 3.10% for
the first three months of 2006 from 2.11% for the same period in 2005.
Interest income totaled $72.1 million for the first three months of 2006. This represented an
increase of $16.4 million, or 29.54%, compared to total interest income of $55.7 million for the
same period last year. The increase in interest income was primarily the result of the increase in
average earning assets from $4.29 billion in the first three months of 2005 to $5.12 billion in the
same period in 2006. This represents a 19.40% increase for the first three months of 2006 over the
same period last year and an increase in the average yield on earning assets by 49 basis points.
19
Interest expense totaled $28.3 million for the first three months of 2006. This represented an
increase of $13.2 million, or 87.98%, over total interest expense of $15.1 million for the same
period last year. The increase in interest expense was primarily the result of an increase in
average interest-bearing liabilities and an increase in the cost of these liabilities by 99 basis
points.
Table 1 shows the average balances of assets, liabilities, and stockholders equity and the
related interest income, expense, and rates for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2006, and
2005. Yields for tax-preferenced investments are shown on a taxable equivalent basis using a 35%
tax rate.
TABLE 1 Distribution of Average Assets, Liabilities, and Stockholders Equity; Interest Rates and Interest Differentials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate (5) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate (5) |
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
$ |
1,822,602 |
|
|
$ |
20,737 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
% |
|
$ |
1,743,110 |
|
|
$ |
18,703 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
% |
Tax preferenced (1) |
|
|
567,438 |
|
|
|
6,245 |
|
|
|
5.95 |
% |
|
|
383,741 |
|
|
|
4,087 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
Investment in FHLB stock |
|
|
71,299 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
% |
|
|
55,245 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
% |
Federal Funds Sold & Interest Bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits with other institutions |
|
|
4,667 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
% |
|
|
5,614 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
% |
Loans (2) (3) |
|
|
2,652,493 |
|
|
|
44,292 |
|
|
|
6.77 |
% |
|
|
2,099,313 |
|
|
|
32,380 |
|
|
|
6.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Earning Assets |
|
|
5,118,499 |
|
|
|
72,132 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
% |
|
|
4,287,023 |
|
|
|
55,683 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
% |
Total Non Earning Assets |
|
|
348,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
5,467,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,549,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings Deposits (4) |
|
$ |
1,231,002 |
|
|
$ |
5,376 |
|
|
|
1.77 |
% |
|
$ |
1,094,458 |
|
|
$ |
2,554 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
% |
Time Deposits |
|
|
829,970 |
|
|
|
7,825 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
496,630 |
|
|
|
2,507 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
2,060,972 |
|
|
|
13,201 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
1,591,088 |
|
|
|
5,061 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
% |
Other Borrowings |
|
|
1,610,620 |
|
|
|
15,106 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
1,279,765 |
|
|
|
9,998 |
|
|
|
3.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities |
|
|
3,671,592 |
|
|
|
28,307 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
2,870,853 |
|
|
|
15,059 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
1,386,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,336,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
53,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
355,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
5,467,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,549,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread tax equivalent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.26 |
% |
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.93 |
% |
Net interest margin tax equivalent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.96 |
% |
Net interest margin excluding loan fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.76 |
% |
Net interest margin excluding loan fees tax equivalent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.79 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non tax equivalent rate for 2006 was 4.49% and 2005 was 4.26%. |
|
(2) |
|
Loan fees are included in total interest income as follows, (000)s omitted: 2006, $1,517 2005, $ 1,761 |
|
(3) |
|
Non performing loans are included in net loans as follows, (000)s omitted: 2006, $0 and 2005, $9. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes interest bearing demand and money market accounts |
|
(5) |
|
Annualized interest rates |
As stated above, the net interest margin measures net interest income as a percentage of
average earning assets. The net interest margin is an indication of how effectively the Company
generates its source of funds and employs its earning assets. The Companys tax effected (TE) net
interest margin declined from 3.96% for the first three months of 2005 to 3.62% for the first three
months of 2006. The decrease in the net interest margin compared to the same period last year was a
result of the increasing interest rate environment, which impacted interest earned and interest
paid as a percent of earning assets. Although the yield on earning assets increased by 49 basis
points for the first quarter of 2006 compared to the same period in 2005, the yield on
interest-bearing liabilities increased by 99 basis points for the first quarter of 2006 compared to
the same period in 2005. The higher increase in cost of interest-bearing liabilities is due to the
short-term liability sensitivity of the Company. In addition, our net interest margin is affected
by the strategies we employ in regards to competition in our market areas.
20
It is difficult to attribute the net interest margin changes to any one factor. However, the
banking and financial service businesses in our market areas are highly competitive. This
competition has an influence on the strategies we employ.
The net interest spread is the difference between the yield on average earning assets less the
cost of average interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest spread is an indication of our
ability to manage interest rates received on loans and investments and paid on deposits and
borrowings in a competitive and changing interest rate environment. Our net interest spread (TE)
was 2.76% for the first three months of 2006 and 3.26% for the same period last year. The decrease
in the net interest spread for the three months ended March 31, 2006 resulted from a 49 basis point
increase in the yield on earning assets offset by a 99 basis point increase in the cost of
interest-bearing liabilities, thus generating a 50 basis point decrease in the net interest spread
over the same period last year.
The yield (TE) on earning assets increased to 5.86% for the first three months of 2006, from
5.37% for the same period last year, and reflects an increasing interest rate environment and a
change in the mix of earning assets. Average loans as a percent of earning assets increased to
51.82% in the first three months of 2006 from 48.97% for the same period in 2005. Average
investments as a percent of earning assets decreased to 46.69% in the first three months of 2006
from 49.61% for the same period in 2005. Average federal funds sold as a percent of earning assets
was 0.06% for the first three months in 2006. There were no federal funds invested in 2005. As a
result of the Granite State Bank acquisition, which was completed in February 2005, we inherited
the investment in interest-bearing deposits with other financial institutions. The average
interest-bearing deposits with other financial institutions as a percent of earning assets
decreased to 0.03% for the first three months in 2006 from 0.13% for the same period in 2005.
Investments and federal funds sold typically have a lower yield than loans. The yield on loans for
the first three months of 2006 increased to 6.77% as compared to 6.26% for the same period in 2005
as a result of the growth in average loans, the increasing interest rate environment and
competition for quality loans. The yield (TE) on investments for the first three months of 2006
increased to 4.89% compared to 4.55% for the same period in 2005 as a result of an increase in
average investment balances and an increase in interest rates. The increase in the yield on earning
assets for the first three months of 2006 was the result of higher yields on loans and investments.
The cost of average interest-bearing liabilities increased to 3.10% for the first three months
of 2006 as compared to 2.11% for the same period in 2005, reflecting the continued increase in
interest rates and a change in the mix of interest-bearing liabilities. Average borrowings as a
percent of average interest-bearing liabilities decreased slightly to 43.87% during the first three
months of 2006 as compared to
44.58% for the same period in 2005. The cost of borrowings for the first three months of 2006
increased to 3.75% as compared to 3.12% for the same period in 2005, reflecting the continued
increase in interest rates. Borrowings typically have a higher cost than interest-bearing
deposits. The cost of interest-bearing deposits for the first three months of 2006 increased to
2.60% as compared to 1.29% for the same period in 2005, also reflecting the continued increase in
interest rates and the competition for interest-bearing deposits. The FDIC has approved the payment
of interest on certain demand deposit accounts. This could have a negative impact on our net
interest margin, net interest spread, and net earnings, should this be implemented fully.
Currently, we pay interest on NOW and Money Market Accounts.
Table 2 summarizes the changes in interest income and interest expense based on changes in
average asset and liability balances (volume) and changes in average rates (rate). For each
category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided with
respect to changes attributable to (1) changes in volume (change in volume multiplied by initial
rate), (2) changes in rate (change in rate multiplied by initial volume) and (3) changes in
rate/volume (change in rate multiplied by change in volume).
21
TABLE 2 Rate and Volume Analysis for Changes in Interest Income, Interest
Expense and Net Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 Compared to 2005 |
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
( amounts in thousands ) |
|
Interest Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable investment securities |
|
$ |
1,018 |
|
|
$ |
1,166 |
|
|
$ |
(150 |
) |
|
$ |
2,034 |
|
Tax-advantaged securities |
|
|
2,804 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
(838 |
) |
|
|
2,158 |
|
Fed funds sold & interest-bearing
deposits with other institutions |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
Investment in FHLB stock |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
Loans |
|
|
8,539 |
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
11,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest on earning assets |
|
|
12,493 |
|
|
|
4,175 |
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
16,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
2,833 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
2,167 |
|
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
5,307 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
5,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest on interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
4,586 |
|
|
|
6,396 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
13,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income |
|
$ |
7,907 |
|
|
$ |
(2,221 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,485 |
) |
|
$ |
3,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and Fees on Loans
Our major source of revenue and primary component of interest income is interest and fees on
loans. Interest and fees on loans totaled $44.3 million for the first three months of 2006. This
represented an increase of $11.9 million, or 36.79%, over interest and fees on loans of $32.4
million for the same period in 2005. The increase in interest and fees on loans for the first three
months of 2006 reflects increases in the average balance of loans and the increase in interest
rates. The yield on loans increased to 6.77 % for the first three months of 2006, compared to 6.26%
for the same period in 2005. Average loans increased 26.35% from $2.10 billion for the first three
months of 2005 to $2.65 billion for the first three months of 2006. Deferred loan origination fees,
net of costs, totaled $10.9 million at March 31, 2006. This represented an increase of $1.1
million, or 11.75%, over deferred loan origination fees, net of costs, of $9.8 million at March 31,
2005.
In general, we stop accruing interest on a loan after its principal or interest becomes 90
days or more past due. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, all interest previously accrued but not
collected is charged against earnings. There was no interest income that was accrued and not
reversed on non-performing loans at March 31, 2006 and 2005.
Fees collected on loans are an integral part of the loan pricing decision. Loan fees and the
direct costs associated with the origination of loans are deferred and deducted from the loan
balance. Deferred net loan fees are recognized in interest income over the term of the loan in a
manner that approximates the level-yield method. We recognized loan fee income of $1.5 million for
the first three months of 2006, as compared to $1.8 million for the same period in 2005, a decrease
of $244,000, or 13.86%.
Interest on Investments
The second most important component of interest income is interest on investments, which
totaled $27.0 million for the first three months of 2006. This represented an increase of $4.2
million, or 18.39%, over interest on investments of $22.8 million for the same period in 2005. The
increase in interest on
22
investments for the first three months of 2006 over the same period last
year reflected increases in the average balance of investments and the increase in interest rates.
The interest rate environment and the investment strategies we employ directly affect the yield on
the investment portfolio. We continually adjust our investment strategies in response to the
changing interest rate environment in order to maximize the rate of total return consistent within
prudent risk parameters, and to minimize the overall interest rate risk of the Company. The
weighted-average yield (TE) on investments increased to 4.89% for the first three months of 2006,
compared to 4.55% for the same period in 2005 as a result of the increase in interest rates.
Provision for Credit Losses
The Company maintains an allowance for inherent credit losses that is increased by a provision
for credit losses charged against operating results. We made a provision for credit losses of
$250,000 during the first three months of 2006. No provision was made during the same period in
2005. We believe the allowance is appropriate. No assurance can be given that economic conditions
which adversely affect the Companys service areas or other circumstances will not be reflected in
increased provisions for credit losses in the future. The nature of this process requires
considerable judgment. See Risk Management Credit Risk herein.
Other Operating Income
Other operating income for the Company includes income derived from special services offered
by the Bank, such as Financial Advisory Services, merchant card, international banking, and other
business services. Also included in other operating income are service charges and fees, primarily
from deposit accounts; gains (net of losses) from the sale of investment securities, other real
estate owned, and fixed assets; and other revenues not included as interest on earning assets.
Other operating income totaled $7.7 million for the first three months of 2006. This
represents an increase of $650,000, or 9.19%, over other operating income of $7.1 million for the
same period in 2005. Other operating income as a percent of net revenues (net interest income
before loan loss provision plus other operating income) was 15.06% for the first three months of
2006, as compared to 14.84% for the same period in 2005.
There were no sales of investment securities generated during the first quarter of 2006 and
2005. Therefore, no gains or losses on sales of securities were recorded for the first three months
ended 2006 and 2005.
Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $3.3 million in the first three months of 2006.
This represented an increase of $250,000 or 8.21% over service charges on deposit accounts of $3.0
million for the same period in 2005. Service charges for demand deposits (checking) accounts for
business customers are generally charged based on an analysis of their activity and include an
earnings allowance based on their average balances. Contributing to the increase in service charges
on deposit accounts in 2006 was the lower average demand deposit balances that resulted in a lower
account earnings allowance, which offsets services charges and the implementation of a revised
service charge schedule. Service charges on deposit accounts represented 42.59% of other operating
income in the first three months of 2006, as compared to 42.97% in the same period in 2005.
Financial Advisory Services consists of Trust Services and Investment Services. Trust Services
provides a variety of services, which include asset management services (both full management
services and custodial services), estate planning, retirement planning, private and corporate
trustee services, and probate services. Investment Services provides mutual funds, certificates of
deposit, and other non-insured investment products. Financial Advisory Services generated fees of
$1.8 million in the first three months of 2006. This represents an increase of $167,000, or 9.95%
over fees generated of $1.7 million in
23
the first three months of 2005. The increase is primarily
due to an increase in assets under administration of $805.3 million. Fees generated by Financial
Advisory Services represented 23.87% of other operating income in the first three months of 2006,
as compared to 23.70% for the same period in 2005.
Bankcard, which provides merchant bankcard services (credit card processing, merchant
terminals, and customer support), generated fees totaling $558,000 in the first three months of
2006. This represented a decrease of $46,000, or 7.57%, from fees generated of $604,000 for the
same period in 2005. Fees generated by Bankcard represented 7.22% of other operating income in the
first three months of 2006, as compared to 8.53% for the same period in 2005.
Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) income totaled $822,000 in the first three months of 2006.
This represented an increase of $481,000, or 140.63%, over the BOLI income generated of $342,000
for the same period in 2005.
Other fees and income, which includes wire fees, other business services, international
banking fees, check sales, ATM fees, miscellaneous income, etc., generated fees totaling $1.2
million in the first three months of 2006. This represented a decrease of $201,000, or 14.25%, from
other fees and income generated of $1.4 million for the same period in 2005.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses for the Company include expenses for salaries and benefits,
occupancy, equipment, stationary and supplies, professional services, promotion, amortization of
intangibles, and other expenses. Other operating expenses totaled $23.5 million for the first three
months of 2006. This represents an increase of $3.1 million, or 15.14% over other operating
expenses of $20.4 million for the same period in 2005. The increase is partially due to the
reversal of $2.6 million in estimated robbery loss in the first three months of 2005.
For the most part, other operating expenses reflect the direct expenses and related
administrative expenses associated with staffing, maintaining, promoting, and operating branch
facilities. Our ability to control other operating expenses in relation to asset growth can be
measured in terms of other operating expenses as a percentage of average assets. Operating expenses
measured as a percentage of average assets decreased to 1.74% for the first three months of 2006,
compared to a ratio of 1.82% for the same period in 2005. The decrease in percentage was primarily
due to the increase in total average assets for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as compared
to the same period in 2005.
Our ability to control other operating expenses in relation to the level of net revenue (net
interest income plus other operating income) is measured by the efficiency ratio and indicates the
percentage of
net revenue that is used to cover expenses. For the first three months of 2006, the efficiency
ratio was 45.75%, compared to a ratio of 42.73% for the same period in 2005. The increase was
primarily due to the reversal of $2.6 million estimated robbery loss as a result of the settlement
in the first three months of 2005. Without the settlement of robbery loss, the efficiency ratio
would have been 48.18% in 2005.
The following table reconciles the differences in operating efficiency ratio with and without
the settlement of robbery loss:
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Efficiency Ratio Reconciliation |
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Without settlement |
|
|
Settlement of |
|
|
Reported |
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
of robbery loss |
|
|
robbery loss |
|
|
amount |
|
|
|
( amounts in thousands ) |
|
Other Operating Expense |
|
$ |
23,470 |
|
|
$ |
22,984 |
|
|
$ |
(2,600 |
) |
|
$ |
20,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
51,304 |
|
|
$ |
47,703 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
47,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Efficiency Ratio |
|
|
45.75 |
% |
|
|
48.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.73 |
% |
We have presented the operating efficiency ratio without the settlement of robbery loss
to show shareholders the earnings from operations were unaffected by the impact of these items. We
believe this presentation allows the reader to determine our profitability before the impact of
items that may not be considered as normal operating items. We believe that the reader will be able
to more easily assess the results of the Companys operations and business.
Salaries and related expenses comprise the greatest portion of other operating expenses.
Salaries and related expenses totaled $12.7 million for the first three months of 2006. This
represented a decrease of $112,000, or 1.0%, from salaries and related expenses of $12.8 million
for the same period in 2005. At March 31, 2006, we employed 682 full time equivalent employees,
compared to 652 full time equivalent employees at March 31, 2005. Salaries and related expenses as
a percent of average assets increased to 0.94% for the first three months of 2006, compared to
1.14% for the same period in 2005.
Occupancy and equipment expenses represent the cost of operating and maintaining branch and
administrative facilities, including the purchase and maintenance of furniture, fixtures, office
equipment and data processing equipment. Occupancy expense totaled $2.0 million for the first three
months of 2006. This represented an increase of $32,000, or 1.58%, over occupancy expense of $2.0
million for the same period in 2005. Equipment expense totaled $1.7 million for the first three
months of 2006 and 2005.
Stationary and supplies expense totaled $1.6 million for the first three months of 2006. This
represented an increase of $391,000, or 32.75%, over the expense of $1.2 million for the same
period in 2005. Professional services totaled $1.3 million for the first three months of 2006. This
represented an increase of $248,000 or 24.18%, over an expense of $1.0 million for the same period
in 2005. Promotion expense totaled $1.5 million for the first three months of 2006. This
represented a decrease of $289,000, or 16.07%, from an expense of $1.8 million for the same period
in 2005.
The amortization expense of intangibles totaled $588,000 for the first three months of 2006.
This represents an increase of $262,000, or 98.58% over an expense of $296,000 for the same period
in 2005. The increase is primarily due to the additional intangible asset as a result of the
Granite State Bank acquisition.
Other operating expense totaled $2.0 million for the first three months of 2006. This
represented an increase of $2.5 million, or 503.0%, over expense of a negative $503,000 for the
same period in 2005. The increase is primarily due to the reversal of $2.6 million of estimated
robbery loss as a result of the settlement with the insurance company in 2005.
25
Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate for the first three months of 2006 was 34.47%, compared to
35.21% for the same period in 2005. The effective tax rates are below the nominal combined Federal
and State tax rates as a result of tax preferenced income from certain investments for each period.
The majority of tax preferenced income is derived from municipal securities.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
The Company reported total assets of $5.53 billion at March 31, 2006. This represented an
increase of $104.9 million, or 1.94%, over total assets of $5.42 billion at December 31, 2005.
Earning assets totaled $5.17 billion at March 31, 2006, increasing $91.5 million, or 1.80%, over
earning assets of $5.08 billion at December 31, 2005. Total liabilities were $5.19 billion at March
31, 2006, up $108.3 million, or 2.13%, over total liabilities of $5.08 billion at December 31,
2005. Total equity decreased $3.3 million, or 0.97%, to $339.6 million at March 31, 2006, compared
with total equity of $342.9 million at December 31, 2005.
Investment Securities
The Company reported total investment securities of $2.41 billion at March 31, 2006. This
represented an increase of $37.1 million, or 1.57%, over total investment securities of $2.37
billion at December 31, 2005. Investment securities comprise 46.51% of the Companys total earning
assets at March 31, 2006.
In accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities, securities held as available-for-sale are reported at current market value for
financial reporting purposes. The related unrealized gains or losses, net of income taxes, are
recorded in stockholders equity. At March 31, 2006, securities held as available-for-sale had a
fair market value of $2.41 billion, representing 100% of total investment securities, with an
amortized cost of $2.46 billion. At March 31, 2006, the net unrealized holding loss on securities
available-for-sale was $49.3 million and that resulted in accumulated other comprehensive loss of
$28.6 million (net of $20.7 million in deferred taxes). At December 31, 2005, the Company reported
net unrealized loss on investment securities available-for-sale of $23.1 million and accumulated
other comprehensive income of $13.4 million (net of deferred taxes of $9.7 million).
Table 3 sets forth investment securities at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
1,185,077 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
(44,174 |
) |
|
|
1,142,037 |
|
|
|
47.44 |
% |
CMOs / REMICs |
|
$ |
628,634 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(11,585 |
) |
|
|
617,135 |
|
|
|
25.64 |
% |
Government agency & government-sponsored
enterprises |
|
$ |
54,616 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
|
53,638 |
|
|
|
2.23 |
% |
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
524,500 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
(8,440 |
) |
|
|
529,060 |
|
|
|
21.98 |
% |
FHLMC preferred stock |
|
$ |
56,070 |
|
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,700 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
% |
Other securities |
|
$ |
6,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,917 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Securities |
|
$ |
2,456,313 |
|
|
$ |
15,852 |
|
|
$ |
(65,179 |
) |
|
$ |
2,406,986 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
498 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
497 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,211,869 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
(29,235 |
) |
|
|
1,184,608 |
|
|
|
49.99 |
% |
CMOs / REMICs |
|
|
617,031 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(7,356 |
) |
|
|
609,912 |
|
|
|
25.74 |
% |
Government agency & government-sponsored
enterprises |
|
|
54,608 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
54,089 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
% |
Municipal bonds |
|
|
452,080 |
|
|
|
15,818 |
|
|
|
(3,998 |
) |
|
|
463,900 |
|
|
|
19.57 |
% |
FHLMC preferred stock |
|
|
56,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,070 |
|
|
|
2.37 |
% |
Other securities |
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Securities |
|
$ |
2,392,972 |
|
|
$ |
18,098 |
|
|
$ |
(41,178 |
) |
|
$ |
2,369,892 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average yield (TE) on the investment portfolio at March 31, 2006 was 4.98%
with a weighted-average life of 4.4 years. This compares to a yield of 4.64% at December 31, 2005
with a weighted-average life of 4.0 years and a yield of 4.38% at March 31, 2005 with a
weighted-average life of 3.8 years. The weighted average life is the average number of years that
each dollar of unpaid principal due remains outstanding. Average life is computed as the
weighted-average time to the receipt of all future cash flows, using as the weights the dollar
amounts of the principal paydowns.
Approximately 96.41% of the portfolio represents securities issued by the U.S government or
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, which guarantee payment of principal and interest.
The remaining CMO/REMICs are backed by agency-pooled collateral or whole loan collateral. All
non-agency CMO/REMIC issues held are rated A or better by either Standard & Poors or Moodys, as
of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or longer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Description of Securities |
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
U.S. Treasury Obligation |
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Government agency & government-
sponsored enterprises |
|
|
32,233 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
20,903 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
53,136 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
423,974 |
|
|
|
12,039 |
|
|
|
684,095 |
|
|
|
32,135 |
|
|
|
1,108,069 |
|
|
|
44,174 |
|
CMO/REMICs |
|
|
338,032 |
|
|
|
5,709 |
|
|
|
259,913 |
|
|
|
5,876 |
|
|
|
597,945 |
|
|
|
11,585 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
260,606 |
|
|
|
7,174 |
|
|
|
31,900 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
292,506 |
|
|
|
8,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,055,344 |
|
|
$ |
25,274 |
|
|
$ |
996,811 |
|
|
$ |
39,905 |
|
|
$ |
2,052,155 |
|
|
$ |
65,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or longer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Description of Securities |
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
U.S. Treasury & Government Securities |
|
$ |
497 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
497 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Government agency & government-
sponsored enterprises |
|
|
2,972 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
18,463 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
21,435 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
459,242 |
|
|
|
8,385 |
|
|
|
634,731 |
|
|
|
20,850 |
|
|
|
1,093,973 |
|
|
|
29,235 |
|
CMO/REMICs |
|
|
444,431 |
|
|
|
5,198 |
|
|
|
119,603 |
|
|
|
2,158 |
|
|
|
564,034 |
|
|
|
7,356 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
162,193 |
|
|
|
3,624 |
|
|
|
8,737 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
170,930 |
|
|
|
3,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,069,335 |
|
|
$ |
17,236 |
|
|
$ |
781,534 |
|
|
$ |
23,942 |
|
|
$ |
1,850,869 |
|
|
$ |
41,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
The tables above show the Companys investment securities gross unrealized losses and
fair value by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The Company has
reviewed individual securities classified as available-for-sale to determine whether a decline in
fair value below the amortized cost basis is other-than-temporary. If it is probable that the
Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of a debt
security not impaired at acquisition, an other-than-temporary impairment shall be considered to
have occurred. If an other-than-temporary impairment occurs, the cost basis of the security would
be written down to its fair value as a new cost basis and the write down accounted for as a
realized loss.
The following summarizes our analysis of these securities and the unrealized losses. This
assessment was based on the following factors: i) the length of the time and the extent to which
the market value has been less than cost; ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of
the issuer; iii) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in a security for a
period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value; and iv) general
market conditions which reflect prospects for the economy as a whole, including interest rates and
sector credit spreads.
U.S. Treasury Obligations and Government Agency & Government Sponsored Enterprises The U.S.
Treasury Obligations and government agency and government sponsored enterprises are backed by the
full faith and credit of the U.S. Treasury and Agencies of the U.S. Government. These securities
are bullet securities, that is, they have a defined maturity date on which the principal is paid.
The contractual term of these investments provides that the Bank will receive the face value of the
bond at maturity which will equal the amortized cost of the bond. Interest is received throughout
the life of the security. The unrealized loss greater than 12 months of $628,000 is comprised of
primarily two issues: one Fannie Mae and one Freddie Mac. These securities mature within 2 years.
The agencies are rated in the As and, although they have had some accounting difficulties in the
past few years, this has not impacted their credit worthiness. Because the decline in market value
is attributable to the changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and the Bank has the
ability and intent to hold these investments until recovery of fair value, which may be at
maturity, the Bank does not consider these investments to be other than temporarily impaired at
March 31, 2006.
Mortgaged-Backed Securities and CMO/REMICs The mortgage-backed and CMO/REMICs securities are
issued and guaranteed by the government sponsored enterprises such as Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mac and
Freddie Mac. These securities are collateralized or backed by the underlying mortgages. All
mortgage-backed securities are rated AAA with average life of approximately 3.3 years. The
contractual cash flows of these investments are guaranteed by agencies of the U.S. government or
private insurance companies. Accordingly, it is expected the securities would not be settled at a
price less than the amortized cost of the bond. The unrealized loss greater than 12 months on these
securities at March 31, 2006 is $38.0 million. This loss is comprised of three main blocks of
securities: FNMAs with a loss of $19.8 million, Freddie Mac with a loss of $16.7 million and non
government sponsored enterprises such as financial institutions with a loss of $1.5 million. This
loss is caused by the increase in interest rates over the last 1½ years. Because the decline in
market value is attributable to the changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and the
Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities until recovery of fair value, which may
be at maturity, management does not consider these investments to be other than temporarily
impaired at March 31, 2006.
Municipal Bonds The municipal bonds in the Banks portfolio are all rated AAA and they are
insured by the largest bond insurance companies with maturities of approximately 8.3 years. The
unrealized loss greater than 12 months on these securities at March 31, 2006 is $1.3 million. As
with the other securities in the portfolio, this loss is due to the rising rate environment not the
credit risk of these securities. The Bank diversifies its holdings by owning selections of
securities from different issuers and by holding securities from geographically diversified
municipal issuers, thus reducing the Banks exposure to any single adverse event. Because the
decline in market value is attributable to the changes
28
in interest rates and not credit quality,
and the Bank has the ability and intent to hold these securities until
recovery of fair value, which may be at maturity, the Bank does not consider these investments to
be other than temporarily impaired at March 31, 2006.
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, investment securities having an amortized cost of
approximately $2.29 billion and $2.04 billion respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits,
short and long-term borrowings, and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.
Loans
At March 31, 2006, we reported total loans, net of deferred loan fees, of $2.72 billion. This
represents an increase of $53.3 million, or 2.0%, over total loans, net of deferred loan fees, of
$2.66 billion at December 31, 2005. Total loans, net of deferred loan fees, comprise 52.51% of our
total earning assets.
Table 4 Distribution of Loan Portfolio by Type (dollar amount in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
$ |
990,533 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
$ |
980,602 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
% |
Real Estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
298,107 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
270,436 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
Mortgage |
|
|
964,548 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
% |
|
|
877,481 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
% |
Consumer, net of unearned discount |
|
|
58,176 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
59,801 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Municipal lease finance receivables |
|
|
120,834 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
108,832 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Auto and equipment leases |
|
|
45,203 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
39,442 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Agribusiness |
|
|
250,642 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
338,035 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Loans |
|
|
2,728,043 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
2,674,629 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(23,584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred net loan fees |
|
|
(10,916 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,766 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans |
|
$ |
2,693,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,640,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans are loans and leases to commercial entities to finance
capital purchases or improvements, or to provide cash flow for operations. Real estate loans are
loans secured by conforming first trust deeds on real property, including property under
construction, commercial property and single family and multifamily residences. Consumer loans
include installment loans to consumers as well as home equity loans and other loans secured by
junior liens on real property. Municipal lease finance receivables are leases to municipalities.
Agribusiness loans are loans to finance the operating needs of wholesale dairy farm operations,
cattle feeders, livestock raisers, and farmers.
Non-performing Assets
As set forth in Table 5, we had no non-performing assets at March 31, 2006 and December 31,
2005. Non-performing assets, include non-performing loans plus other real estate owned (foreclosed
property), non-performing loans, include non-accrual loans, loans past due 90 or more days and
still accruing, and restructured loans. In addition, we had no loans classified as impaired at
March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
Although we believe that non-performing assets are generally secured and that potential losses
are provided for in the allowance for credit losses, there can be no assurance that future
deterioration in economic conditions or collateral values would not result in future credit losses.
29
TABLE 5 Non-Performing Assets (dollar amount in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Loans past due 90 days or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of nonperforming assets
to total loans outstanding & OREO |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of nonperforming assets
to total assets |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Except for non-performing loans as set forth in Table 5 and loans disclosed as impaired,
(see Risk Management Credit Risk herein) we are not aware of any loans as of March 31, 2006 for
which known credit problems of the borrower would cause serious doubts as to the ability of such
borrowers to comply with their present loan repayment terms, or any known events that would result
in the loan being designated as non-performing at some future date. We cannot, however, predict the
extent to which the deterioration in general economic conditions, real estate values, increase in
general rates of interest, change in the financial conditions or business of a borrower may
adversely affect a borrowers ability to pay.
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company held no properties as other real estate
owned.
Deposits
The primary source of funds to support earning assets (loans and investments) is the
generation of deposits from our customer base. The ability to grow the customer base and
subsequently deposits is a crucial element in the performance of the Company.
At March 31, 2006, total deposits were $3.48 billion, representing an increase of $52.0
million, or 1.52%, over total deposits of $3.42 billion at December 31, 2005. Average total
deposits for the first three months of 2006 were $3.45 billion. The comparison of average balances
for the first three months of 2006 has historically been more representative of our Companys
growth in deposits as it excludes the historical seasonal peak in deposits at year-end. The
composition of deposits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
1,362,022 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
% |
|
$ |
1,490,613 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
% |
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings Deposits |
|
|
1,222,681 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
|
1,150,256 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
891,378 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
783,177 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
3,476,081 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,424,046 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
The amount of non-interest-bearing demand deposits in relation to total deposits is an
integral element in achieving a low cost of funds. Demand deposits totaled $1.36 billion at March
31, 2006, representing a decrease of $128.6 million, or 8.63%, from total demand deposits of $1.49
billion at
December 31, 2005. Non-interest-bearing demand deposits represented 39.18% of total deposits as of
March 31, 2006 and 43.53% of total deposits as of December 31, 2005.
Savings deposits, which include savings, interest-bearing demand, and money market accounts,
totaled $1.22 billion at March 31, 2006, representing an increase of $72.4 million, or 6.30%, over
savings deposits of $1.15 billion at December 31, 2005.
Time deposits totaled $891.4 million at March 31, 2006 of which $95.5 million were brokered.
This represented an increase of $108.2 million, or 13.82%, over total time deposits of $783.2
million at December 31, 2005.
Other Borrowed Funds
To achieve the desired growth in earning assets and to fully utilize our capital, we fund this
growth through generating sources of funds other than deposits. The first source of funds we pursue
is non-interest-bearing deposits (the lowest cost of funds to the Company). Next we pursue the
growth in interest-bearing deposits and finally we supplement the growth in deposits with borrowed
funds. Average borrowed funds, as a percent of average total funding (total deposits plus demand
notes plus borrowed funds) was 30.47% as of March 31, 2006, as compared to 30.55% as of December
31, 2005.
During 2006 and 2005, we entered into short-term borrowing agreements (borrowings with
maturities of less than one year) with the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and other institutions.
The Bank had outstanding balances of $1.17 billion and $830.0 million under these agreements at
March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The weighted average annual interest rate was
3.60% and 3.35% at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The FHLB holds certain
investment securities of the Bank as collateral for these borrowings.
We also entered into long-term borrowing agreements (borrowings with maturities of one year or
longer) with the FHLB. We had outstanding balances of $305.0 million and $580.0 million under these
agreements at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The weighted average annual
interest rate was 4.16% and 3.62% at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The FHLB
holds certain investment securities of the Bank as collateral for these borrowings.
The Bank has an agreement, known as the Treasury Tax & Loan (TT&L) Note Option
Program with the Federal Reserve Bank and the U.S. Department of Treasury in which federal tax
deposits made by depositors can be held by the bank until called (withdrawn) by the U.S. Department
of Treasury. The maximum amount of accumulated federal tax deposits allowable to be held by the
Bank, as set forth in the agreement, is $15.0 million. On March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 the
amounts held by the Bank in the TT&L Note Option Program were $1.0 million and $6.4 million,
collateralized by securities, respectively. Amounts are payable on demand. The Bank borrows at a
variable rate of 24 and 43 basis points less than the average weekly federal funds rate, which was
4.41% and 3.21% at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
At March 31, 2006, borrowed funds totaled $1.55 billion, representing an increase of $48.5
million, or 3.22%, over total borrowed funds of $1.50 billion at December 31, 2005.
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the Companys aggregate contractual obligations as
of March 31, 2006:
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Four Year |
|
|
After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One |
|
|
to Three |
|
|
to Five |
|
|
Five |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
3,476,081 |
|
|
$ |
3,437,786 |
|
|
$ |
26,036 |
|
|
$ |
9,610 |
|
|
$ |
2,649 |
|
FHLB and Other Borrowings |
|
|
1,550,000 |
|
|
|
1,245,000 |
|
|
|
205,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Subordinated Debentures |
|
|
108,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,250 |
|
Deferred Compensation |
|
|
8,679 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
2,253 |
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
4,251 |
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
17,182 |
|
|
|
4,384 |
|
|
|
9,546 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,160,192 |
|
|
$ |
4,687,921 |
|
|
$ |
242,835 |
|
|
$ |
112,920 |
|
|
$ |
116,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits represent non-interest bearing, money market, savings, NOW, certificates of
deposits, brokered and all other deposits.
FHLB borrowings represent the amounts that are due to the Federal Home Loan Bank. These
borrowings have fixed maturity dates. Other borrowings represent the amounts that are due to
overnight Federal funds purchases and TT&L.
Junior subordinated debentures represent the amounts that are due from the Company to CVB
Statutory Trust I, CVB Statutory Trust II & CVB Statutory Trust III. The debentures have the same
maturity as the Trust Preferred Securities. CVB Statutory Trust I and II, which mature in 2033 and
become callable in whole or in part in 2008. CVB Statutory Trust III which matures in 2036 and
become callable in whole or in part in 2011.
Deferred compensation represents the amounts that are due to former employees salary
continuation agreements as a result of acquisitions.
Operating leases represent the total minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating
leases.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At March 31, 2006, we had commitments to extend credit of approximately $972.5 million
and obligations under letters of credit of $67.5 million and available lines of credit
totaling $1.0 billion from certain institutions. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to
lend to customers, provided there is no violation of any condition established in the contract.
Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require
payment of a fee. Commitments are generally variable rate, and many of these commitments are
expected to expire without being drawn upon. As such, the total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank uses the same credit underwriting policies
in granting or accepting such commitments or contingent obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet
instruments, which consist of evaluating customers creditworthiness individually.
Standby letters of credit written are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee
the financial performance of a customer to a first party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to
support private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is
essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. When deemed
necessary, the Bank holds appropriate collateral supporting those commitments. We do not anticipate
any material losses as a result of these transactions.
The following table summarizes the off-balance sheet arrangements at March 31, 2006:
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Four Year |
|
|
After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One |
|
|
to Three |
|
|
to Five |
|
|
Five |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
2006 |
|
( Amounts in thousands ) |
|
Commitment to extend credit |
|
|
972,487 |
|
|
|
361,700 |
|
|
|
43,488 |
|
|
|
83,322 |
|
|
|
483,977 |
|
Obligations under letters of credit |
|
|
67,543 |
|
|
|
49,942 |
|
|
|
11,762 |
|
|
|
5,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,040,030 |
|
|
$ |
411,642 |
|
|
$ |
55,250 |
|
|
$ |
89,161 |
|
|
$ |
483,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Cash Flow
Since the primary sources and uses of funds for the Bank are loans and deposits, the
relationship between gross loans and total deposits provides a useful measure of the Banks
liquidity. Typically, the closer the ratio of loans to deposits is to 100%, the more reliant the
Bank is on its loan portfolio to provide for short-term liquidity needs. Since repayment of loans
tends to be less predictable than the maturity of investments and other liquid resources, the
higher the loans to deposit ratio the less liquid are the Banks assets. For the first three months
of 2006, the Banks loan to deposit ratio averaged 76.93%, compared to an average ratio of 71.70%
for the same period in 2005.
CVB is a company separate and apart from the Bank that must provide for its own liquidity.
Substantially all of CVBs revenues are obtained from dividends declared and paid by the Bank. The
remaining cashflow is from rents paid by third parties on office space in the Companys corporate
headquarters. There are statutory and regulatory provisions that could limit the ability of the
Bank to pay dividends to CVB. At March 31, 2006, approximately $91.4 million of the Banks equity
was unrestricted and available to be paid as dividends to CVB. Management of CVB believes that such
restrictions will not have an impact on the ability of CVB to meet its ongoing cash obligations.
For the Bank, sources of funds normally include principal payments on loans and investments,
other borrowed funds, and growth in deposits. Uses of funds include withdrawal of deposits,
interest paid on deposits, increased loan balances, purchases, and other operating expenses.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $23.4 million for the first three months of
2006, compared to $27.3 million for the same period last year. The decrease was primarily the
result of the increases in interest paid and cash paid to suppliers and employees.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $141.8 million for the first three months of
2006, compared to $187.6 million used by investing activities for the same period in 2005. The
decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in the purchase of investment securities, offset by
an increase in loans.
Funds provided by financing activities totaled $119.7 million for the first three months of
2006, compared to funds provided by financing activities of $203.0 million for the same period last
year. The decrease in net cash provided by financing activities was primarily the result of a
decrease in transaction deposits and repayment of FHLB advances, offset by increases in time
deposits, short-term borrowings and the issuance of junior subordinated debentures during the
period.
At March 31, 2006, cash and cash equivalents totaled $131.5 million. This represented an
increase of $4.3 million, or 3.41%, over a total of $127.1 million at March 31, 2005 and an
increase of $1.3 million, or 1.01%, over a total of $130.1 million at December 31, 2005.
Capital Resources
CVB Statutory Trust III CVB Statutory Trust III was created on January 31, 2006 for the
exclusive purpose of issuing and selling Trust Preferred Securities at 3-month LIBOR set at 4.53%.
The Company
33
invested $774,000 to establish the Trust. The $774,000 was recorded as investment in
CVB Statutory
Trust III and is presented as part of the other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. On
January 31, 2006, CVB Statutory Trust III completed a $25,000,000 offering of Trust Preferred
Securities and used the gross proceeds from the offering and other cash totaling $25,774,000 to
purchase a like amount of a junior subordinated debenture of the Company.
The junior subordinated debenture was issued concurrent with the issuance of the Trust
Preferred Securities. The interest on the junior subordinated debenture, paid by the Company to CVB
Statutory Trust III, represents the sole revenues of CVB Statutory Trust III and the sole source of
dividend distribution to the holders of the Trust Preferred Securities. The Company has fully and
conditionally guaranteed all of CVB Statutory Trust IIIs obligations under the Trust Preferred
Securities. The junior subordinated debenture is presented on a separate line on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. For financial reporting purposes, the Company records the interest paid to the
Trust as Interest expense junior subordinated debentures on its Consolidated Statements of
Income.
We have the right, assuming no default has occurred, to defer payments of interest on the
junior subordinated debenture at any time for a period not to exceed 20 consecutive quarters. The
Trust Preferred Securities will mature on March 15, 2036, but become callable in part or in total
on March 15, 2011 by CVB Statutory Trust III. The Trust Preferred Securities have a 3-month LIBOR
rate plus 1.38% that reset quarterly.
Historically, our primary source of capital has been the retention of operating earnings. In
order to ensure adequate levels of capital, we conduct an ongoing assessment of projected sources
and uses of capital in conjunction with projected increases in assets and the level of risk.
The Bank and the Company are required to meet risk-based capital standards set by their
respective regulatory authorities. The risk-based capital standards require the achievement of a
minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0% (of which at least 4.0% must be Tier
1 capital). In addition, the regulatory authorities require the highest rated institutions to
maintain a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. At March 31, 2006, the Bank and the Company exceeded the
minimum risk-based capital ratio and leverage ratio required to be considered Well Capitalized.
On July 2, 2003, the Federal Reserve Bank issued Supervisory Letter SR 03-13 clarifying that
bank holding companies should continue to report trust preferred securities in accordance with
current Federal Reserve Bank instructions which allows trust preferred securities to be counted in
Tier I capital subject to certain limitations. The Federal Reserve has indicated it will review the
implications of any accounting treatment changes and, if necessary or warranted, will provide
appropriate guidance. On May 6, 2005, the Federal Reserve Bank released a proposed rule that would
retain trust preferred securities in Tier I capital of bank holding companies, but with stricter
quantitative limits and clearer qualitative standards.
The Companys equity capital was $339.6 million at March 31, 2006. This represented a decrease
of $3.3 million, or 0.97% from equity capital of $342.9 million at December 31, 2005. The decrease
was due primarily to the net unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale in the amount of
$15.2 million and the payment of dividends in the amount of $6.9 million. This decrease was
partially offset by the net earnings for the first three months of 2006 in the amount of $18.2
million. The Companys 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K (Managements Discussion and Analysis and
Note 16 of the accompanying financial statements) describes the regulatory capital requirements of
the Company and the Bank.
Table 6 below presents the Companys and the Banks risk-based and leverage capital ratios as
of March 31, 2006, and December 31, 2005.
34
Table 6 Regulatory Capital Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
Capital Ratios |
|
Ratios |
|
Company |
|
Bank |
|
Company |
|
Bank |
Risk-based capital ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
12.19 |
% |
|
|
11.02 |
% |
|
|
11.29 |
% |
|
|
10.82 |
% |
Total |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
12.92 |
% |
|
|
11.75 |
% |
|
|
12.00 |
% |
|
|
11.53 |
% |
Leverage ratio |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
7.96 |
% |
|
|
7.19 |
% |
|
|
7.66 |
% |
|
|
7.34 |
% |
RISK MANAGEMENT
We have adopted a Risk Management Plan to ensure the proper control and management of all risk
factors inherent in the operation of the Company and the Bank. Specifically, credit risk, interest
rate risk, liquidity risk, transaction risk, compliance risk, strategic risk, reputation risk,
price risk and foreign exchange risk, can all affect the market risk exposure of the Company. These
specific risk factors are not mutually exclusive. It is recognized that any product or service
offered by us may expose the Bank to one or more of these risks.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is defined as the risk to earnings or capital arising from an obligors failure to
meet the terms of any contract or otherwise fail to perform as agreed. Credit risk is found in all
activities where success depends on counter party, issuer, or borrower performance. Credit
risk arises through the extension of loans and leases, certain securities, and letters of credit.
Credit risk in the investment portfolio and correspondent bank accounts is addressed through
defined limits in the Banks policy statements. In addition, certain securities carry insurance to
enhance credit quality of the bond. Limitations on industry concentration, aggregate customer
borrowings, geographic boundaries and standards on loan quality also are designed to reduce loan
credit risk. Senior Management, Directors Committees, and the Board of Directors are provided with
information to appropriately identify, measure, control and monitor the credit risk of the Bank.
Implicit in lending activities is the risk that losses will occur and that the amount of such
losses will vary over time. Consequently, we maintain an allowance for credit losses by charging a
provision for credit losses to earnings. Loans determined to be losses are charged against the
allowance for credit losses. Our allowance for credit losses is maintained at a level considered by
us to be adequate to provide for estimated probable losses inherent in the existing portfolio, and
unused commitments to provide financing, including commitments under commercial and standby letters
of credit.
The allowance for credit losses is based upon estimates of probable losses inherent in the
loan and lease portfolio. The nature of the process by which we determine the appropriate allowance
for credit losses requires the exercise of considerable judgment. The amount actually observed in
respect of these losses can vary significantly from the estimated amounts. We employ a systematic
methodology that is intended to reduce the differences between estimated and actual losses.
Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance is conducted on a regular
basis and considers all loans. The systematic methodology consists of two major elements.
The first major element includes a detailed analysis of the loan portfolio in two phases. The
first phase is conducted in accordance with SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for the
Impairment of a Loan, as amended by SFAS No. 118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a
Loan Income Recognition and Disclosures. Individual loans are reviewed to identify loans for
impairment. A loan is
35
impaired when principal and interest are deemed uncollectable in accordance
with the original contractual
terms of the loan. Impairment is measured as either the expected future cash flows discounted at
each loans effective interest rate, the fair value of the loans collateral if the loan is
collateral dependent, or an observable market price of the loan (if one exists). Upon measuring the
impairment, we will insure an appropriate level of allowance is present or established.
Central to the first phase and our credit risk management is its loan risk rating system. The
originating credit officer assigns borrowers an initial risk rating, which is reviewed and possibly
changed by Credit Management, which is based primarily on a thorough analysis of each borrowers
financial capacity in conjunction with industry and economic trends. Approvals are made based upon
the amount of inherent credit risk specific to the transaction and are reviewed for appropriateness
by senior line and credit management personnel. Credits are monitored by line and credit management
personnel for deterioration in a borrowers financial condition, which would impact the ability of
the borrower to perform under the contract. Risk ratings are adjusted as necessary.
Loans are risk rated into the following categories: Impaired, Doubtful, Substandard, Special
Mention and Pass. Each of these groups is assessed for the proper amount to be used in determining
the adequacy of our allowance for losses. While each loan is looked at annually to determine its
proper classification, the Impaired and Doubtful loans are analyzed on an individual basis for
allowance amounts. The other categories have formulae used to determine the needed allowance
amount.
Based on the risk rating system, specific allowances are established in cases where we have
identified significant conditions or circumstances related to a credit that we believe indicates
the probability that a loss has been incurred. We perform a detailed analysis of these loans,
including, but not limited to, cash flows, appraisals of the collateral, conditions of the
marketplace for liquidating the collateral and assessment of the guarantors. We then determine the
inherent loss potential and allocate a portion of the allowance for losses as a specific allowance
for each of these credits.
The second phase is conducted by evaluating or segmenting the remainder of the loan portfolio
into groups or pools of loans with similar characteristics in accordance with SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies. In this second phase, groups or pools of homogeneous loans are
reviewed to determine a portfolio formula allowance. In the case of the portfolio formula
allowance, homogeneous portfolios, such as small business loans, consumer loans, agricultural
loans, and real estate loans, are aggregated or pooled in determining the appropriate allowance.
The risk assessment process in this case emphasizes trends in the different portfolios for
delinquency, loss, and other-behavioral characteristics of the subject portfolios.
The second major element in our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance
consists of our considerations of all known relevant internal and external factors that may affect
a loans collectibility. This includes our estimates of the amounts necessary for concentrations,
economic uncertainties, the volatility of the market value of collateral, and other relevant
factors. The relationship of the two major elements of the allowance to the total allowance may
fluctuate from period to period.
In the second major element of the analysis which considers all known relevant internal and
external factors that may affect a loans collectibility, we perform an evaluation of various
conditions, the effects of which are not directly measured in the determination of the formula and
specific allowances. The evaluation of the inherent loss with respect to these conditions is
subject to a higher degree of uncertainty because they are not identified with specific problem
credits or portfolio segments. The conditions evaluated in connection with the second element of
the analysis of the allowance include, but are not limitted to the following conditions that
existed as of the balance sheet date:
|
|
|
then-existing general economic and business conditions affecting the key lending areas of
the Company, |
36
|
|
|
then-existing economic and business conditions of areas outside the lending areas, such as
other sections of the United States, Asia and Latin America, |
|
|
|
|
credit quality trends (including trends in non-performing loans expected to result from
existing conditions), |
|
|
|
|
collateral values, |
|
|
|
|
loan volumes and concentrations, |
|
|
|
|
seasoning of the loan portfolio, |
|
|
|
|
specific industry conditions within portfolio segments, |
|
|
|
|
recent
loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, |
|
|
|
|
duration of
the current business cycle, |
|
|
|
|
bank regulatory examination results and |
|
|
|
|
findings of the Companys internal credit examiners. |
We review these conditions in discussion with our senior credit officers. To the extent that
any of these conditions is evidenced by a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio
segment as of the evaluation date, our estimate of the effect of such condition may be reflected as
a specific allowance applicable to such credit or portfolio segment. Where any of these conditions
is not evidenced by a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the
evaluation date, our evaluation of the inherent loss related to such condition is reflected in the
second major element of the allowance. Although we have allocated a portion of the allowance to
specific loan categories, the adequacy of the allowance must be considered in its entirety.
We maintain an allowance for inherent credit losses that is increased by a provision for
credit losses charged against operating results. The allowance for credit losses is also increased
by recoveries on loans previously charged off and reduced by actual loan losses charged to the
allowance. The Company recorded $250,000 provision for credit looses during the first three months
of 2006. There was no provision for credit losses during the first three months of 2005.
At March 31, 2006, we reported an allowance for credit losses of $23.6 million. This
represented an increase of $380,000, or 1.64%, over the allowance for credit losses of $23.2
million at December 31, 2005. The increase is primarily due to the provision for credit losses of
$250,000, offset by recoveries exceeding charge-offs for the first quarter of 2006.
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had no loans classified as impaired.
Non-performing loans include non-accrual loans, loans past due 90 or more days and still
accruing, and restructured loans. There were no non-accrual loans at March 31, 2006 and December
31, 2005.
37
TABLE 7 Summary of Credit Loss Experience
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
Amount of Total Loans at End of Period (1) |
|
$ |
2,717,127 |
|
|
$ |
2,184,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Total Loans Outstanding (1) |
|
$ |
2,652,493 |
|
|
$ |
2,099,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of Period |
|
$ |
23,204 |
|
|
$ |
22,494 |
|
Acquisition of Granite State Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
756 |
|
Loans Charged-Off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Lease Financing Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans Charged-Off |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
Lease Financing Receivables |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans Recovered |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
Net Loans (Recovered) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision Charged to Operating Expense |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses at End of period |
|
$ |
23,584 |
|
|
$ |
23,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of deferred loan fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans Charged-Off (Recovered) to Average Total Loans |
|
|
-0.00 |
% |
|
|
-0.03 |
% |
Net Loans Charged-Off (Recovered) to Total Loans at End of
Period |
|
|
-0.00 |
% |
|
|
-0.03 |
% |
Allowance for Credit Losses to Average Total Loans |
|
|
0.89 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
Allowance for Credit Losses to Total Loans at End of Period |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
1.10 |
% |
Net Loans Charged-Off (Recovered) to Allowance for Credit
Losses |
|
|
-0.55 |
% |
|
|
-2.85 |
% |
Net Loans Charged-Off (Recovered) to Provision for Credit
Losses |
|
|
-52.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
While we believe that the allowance at March 31, 2006, was adequate to absorb losses from
any known or inherent risks in the portfolio, no assurance can be given that economic conditions or
natural disasters which adversely affect the Companys service areas or other circumstances will
not be reflected in increased provisions or credit losses in the future.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risk
In the normal course of its business activities, we are exposed to market risks, including
price and liquidity risk. Market risk is the potential of loss from adverse changes in market rates
and prices, such as interest rates (interest rate risk). Liquidity risk arises from the possibility
that we may not be able to satisfy current or future commitments or that we may be more reliant on
alternative funding sources such as long-term debt. Financial products that expose us to market
risk include securities, loans, deposits, debts and derivative financial instruments.
Interest Rate Risk
During periods of changing interest rates, the ability to reprice interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities can influence net interest income, the net interest margin, and
consequently, our earnings. Interest rate risk is managed by attempting to control the spread
between rates earned on
interest-earning assets and the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities within the
constraints imposed by market competition in the Banks service area. Short-term repricing risk is
minimized by controlling the
38
level of floating rate loans and maintaining a downward sloping ladder
of bond payments and maturities. Basis risk is managed by the timing and magnitude of changes to
interest-bearing deposit rates. Yield curve risk is reduced by keeping the duration of the loan and
bond portfolios balanced to attempt to minimize the risks of rising or falling yields. Options risk
in the bond portfolio is monitored monthly and actions are recommended when appropriate.
We monitor the interest rate sensitivity risk to earnings from potential changes in interest
rates using various methods, including a maturity/repricing gap analysis. This analysis measures,
at specific time intervals, the differences between earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities
for which repricing opportunities will occur. A positive difference, or gap, indicates that earning
assets will reprice faster than interest-bearing liabilities. This will generally produce a greater
net interest margin during periods of rising interest rates, and a lower net interest margin during
periods of declining interest rates. Conversely, a negative gap will generally produce a lower net
interest margin during periods of rising interest rates and a greater net interest margin during
periods of decreasing interest rates.
The interest rates paid on deposit accounts do not always move in unison with the rates
charged on loans. In addition, the magnitude of changes in the rates charged on loans is not always
proportionate to the magnitude of changes in the rate paid for deposits. Consequently, changes in
interest rates do not necessarily result in an increase or decrease in the net interest margin
solely as a result of the differences between repricing opportunities of earning assets or
interest-bearing liabilities. In general, when we report a positive gap in the short-term period
and negative gap in the long-term period does not necessarily indicate that, if interest rates
decreased, net interest income would increase, or if interest rates increased, net interest income
would decrease.
Approximately $1.84 billion, or 80.44%, of the total investment portfolio at March 31, 2006
consisted of securities backed by mortgages. The final maturity of these securities can be affected
by the speed at which the underlying mortgages repay. Mortgages tend to repay faster as interest
rates fall, and slower as interest rates rise. As a result, we may be subject to a prepayment
risk resulting from greater funds available for reinvestment at a time when available yields are
lower. Conversely, we may be subject to extension risk resulting from lesser amounts available
for reinvestment at a time when available yields are higher. Prepayment risk includes the risk
associated with the payment of an investments principal faster than originally intended. Extension
risk is the risk associated with the payment of an investments principal over a longer time period
than originally anticipated. In addition, there can be greater risk of price volatility for
mortgage-backed securities as a result of anticipated prepayment or extension risk.
We also utilize the results of a dynamic simulation model to quantify the estimated exposure
of net interest income to sustained interest rate changes. The sensitivity of our net interest
income is measured over a rolling two-year horizon.
The simulation model estimates the impact of changing interest rates on the interest income
from all interest-earning assets and the interest expense paid on all interest-bearing liabilities
reflected on the Companys balance sheet. This sensitivity analysis is compared to policy limits,
which specify a maximum tolerance level for net interest income exposure over a one-year horizon
assuming no balance sheet growth, given both a 200 basis point upward and downward shift in
interest rates. A parallel and pro rata shift in rates over a 12-month period is assumed.
39
The following depicts the Companys net interest income sensitivity analysis as of March 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Net |
Simulated |
|
Interest Income |
Rate Changes |
|
Sensitivity |
+ 200 basis points
|
|
( 6.12% ) |
200 basis points
|
|
6.34% |
The estimated sensitivity does not necessarily represent our forecast and the results may
not be indicative of actual changes to our net interest income. These estimates are based upon a
number of assumptions including: the nature and timing of interest rate levels including yield
curve shape, prepayments on loans and securities, pricing strategies on loans and deposits, and
replacement of asset and liability cash flows. While the assumptions used are based on current
economic and local market conditions, there is no assurance as to the predictive nature of these
conditions including how customer preferences or competitor influences might change.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk to earnings or capital resulting from our inability to meet its
obligations when they come due without incurring unacceptable losses. It includes the ability to
manage unplanned decreases or changes in funding sources and to recognize or address changes in
market conditions that affect our ability to liquidate assets quickly and with minimum loss of
value. Factors considered in liquidity risk management are stability of the deposit base;
marketability, maturity, and pledging of investments; and the demand for credit.
In general, liquidity risk is managed daily by controlling the level of fed funds and the use
of funds provided by the cash flow from the investment portfolio. To meet unexpected demands, lines
of credit are maintained with correspondent banks, the Federal Home Loan Bank and the Federal
Reserve Bank. The sale of bonds maturing in the near future can also serve as a contingent source
of funds. Increases in deposit rates are considered a last resort as a means of raising funds to
increase liquidity.
Transaction Risk
Transaction risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from problems in service or
product delivery. This risk is significant within any bank and is interconnected with other risk
categories in most activities throughout the Bank. Transaction risk is a function of internal
controls, information systems, associate integrity, and operating processes. It arises daily
throughout the Bank as transactions are processed. It pervades all divisions, departments and
branches and is inherent in all products and services we offer.
In general, transaction risk is defined as high, medium or low by the internal auditors during
the audit process. The audit plan ensures that high-risk areas are reviewed at least annually.
The key to monitoring transaction risk is in the design, documentation and implementation of
well-defined procedures. All transaction related procedures include steps to report events that
might increase transaction risk. Dual controls are also a form of monitoring.
Compliance Risk
Compliance risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from violations of, or
non-conformance with, laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices, or ethical standards.
Compliance risk also arises in situations where the laws or rules governing certain Bank products
or activities of the Banks customers
40
may be ambiguous or untested. Compliance risk exposes us to
fines, civil money penalties, payment of damages, and the voiding of contracts. Compliance risk can
also lead to a diminished reputation, reduced business value, limited business opportunities,
lessened expansion potential, and lack of contract enforceability.
There is no single or primary source of compliance risk. It is inherent in every Bank
activity. Frequently, it blends into operational risk and transaction processing. A portion of this
risk is sometimes referred to as legal risk. This is not limited solely to risk from failure to
comply with consumer protection laws; it encompasses all laws, as well as prudent ethical standards
and contractual obligations. It also includes the exposure to litigation from all aspects of
banking, traditional and non-traditional.
Our Compliance Management Policy and Program and the Code of Ethical Conduct are the
cornerstone for controlling compliance risk. An integral part of controlling this risk is the
proper training of associates. The Compliance Officer is responsible for developing and executing a
comprehensive compliance training program. The Compliance Officer will ensure that each associate
receives adequate training with regard to their position to ensure that laws and regulations are
not violated. All associates who deal in compliance high risk areas are trained to be knowledgeable
about the level and severity of exposure in those areas and the policies and procedures in place to
control such exposure.
Our Compliance Management Policy and Program includes an audit program aimed at identifying
problems and ensuring that problems are corrected. The audit program includes two levels of review.
One is in-depth audits performed by an external firm and the other is periodic monitoring performed
by the Compliance Officer.
We utilize an external firm to conduct compliance audits as a means of identifying weaknesses
in the compliance program itself. The external firms audit plan includes a periodic review of each
branch and department of the Bank.
The branch or department that is the subject of an audit is required to respond to the audit
and correct any violations noted. The Compliance Officer will review audit findings and the
response provided by the branch or department to identify areas which pose a significant compliance
risk.
The Compliance Officer conducts periodic monitoring of our compliance efforts with a special
focus on those areas that expose us to compliance risk. The purpose of the periodic monitoring is
to ensure that our associates are adhering to established policies and procedures adopted by the
Bank. The Compliance Officer will notify the appropriate department head and the Compliance
Committee of any violations noted. The branch or department that is the subject of the review will
be required to respond to the findings and correct any noted violations.
We recognize that customer complaints can often identify weaknesses in our compliance program
which could expose the Bank to risk. Therefore, all complaints are given prompt attention. Our
Compliance Management Policy and Program includes provisions on how customer complaints are to be
addressed. The Compliance Officer reviews all complaints to determine if a significant compliance
risk exists and communicates those findings to Senior Management.
Strategic Risk
Strategic risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from adverse decisions or improper
implementation of strategic decisions. This risk is a function of the compatibility between an
organizations goals, the resources deployed against those goals and the quality of implementation.
41
Strategic risks are identified as part of the strategic planning process. Offsite strategic
planning sessions are held annually. The strategic review consists of an economic assessment,
competitive analysis, industry outlook and legislative and regulatory review.
A primary measurement of strategic risk is peer group analysis. Key performance ratios are
compared to three separate peer groups to identify any sign of weakness and potential
opportunities. The peer group consists of:
|
1. |
|
All banks of comparable size |
|
|
2. |
|
High performing banks |
|
|
3. |
|
A list of specific banks |
Another measure is the comparison of the actual results of previous strategic initiatives
against the expected results established prior to implementation of each strategy.
The corporate strategic plan is formally presented to all branch managers and department
managers at an annual leadership conference.
Reputation Risk
Reputation risk is the risk to capital and earnings arising from negative public opinion. This
affects our ability to establish new relationships or services, or continue servicing existing
relationships. It can expose us to litigation and, in some instances, financial loss.
Price and Foreign Exchange Risk
Price risk arises from changes in market factors that affect the value of traded instruments.
Foreign exchange risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from movements in foreign exchange
rates.
Our current exposure to price risk is nominal. We do not have trading accounts. Consequently,
the level of price risk within the investment portfolio is limited to the need to sell securities
for reasons other than trading. The section of this policy pertaining to liquidity risk addresses
this risk.
We maintain deposit accounts with various foreign banks. Our Interbank Liability Policy limits
the balance in any of these accounts to an amount that does not present a significant risk to our
earnings from changes in the value of foreign currencies.
Our asset liability model calculates the market value of the Banks equity. In addition,
management prepares on a monthly basis a Capital Volatility report that compares changes in the
market value of the investment portfolio. We have as our target to always be well-capitalized by
regulatory standards.
The Balance Sheet Management Policy requires the submission of a Fair Value Matrix Report to
the Balance Sheet Management Committee on a quarterly basis. The report calculates the economic
value of equity under different interest rate scenarios, revealing the level or price risk of the
Banks interest sensitive asset and liability portfolios.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain controls and procedures designed to ensure that information is recorded and
reported in all filings of financial reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such
information is reported to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and its
Chief Financial Officer to allow timely and accurate disclosure based on the definition of
disclosure controls and
procedures in SEC Rule 13a-15(e). In designing these controls and procedures, management
recognizes
42
that they can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control
objectives. We also evaluate the cost-benefit relationship of controls and procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures under the supervision and with
the participation of the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and other senior
management of the Company. Based on the foregoing, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
During our most recent fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our
internal control over financial reporting.
43
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Not Applicable
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Except as describe below, there were no material changes from the risk factors set
forth in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of the Companys FORM 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005, during the three months ended March 31, 2006. Please refer to that
section of the Companys FORM 10-K for disclosure regarding the risks and uncertainties
related to the Companys business.
We are dependent on key personnel and the loss of one or more of those key personnel
may materially and adversely affect our prospects Competition for qualified employees
and personnel in the banking industry is intense and there are a limited number of
qualified persons with knowledge of, and experience in, the California community banking
industry. The process of recruiting personnel with the combination of skills and
attributes required to carry out our strategies is often lengthy. Our success depends to a
significant degree upon our ability to attract and retain qualified management, credit
quality, loan origination, finance, administrative, marketing and technical personnel and
upon the continued contributions of our management and personnel. In particular, our
success has been and continues to be highly dependent upon the abilities of our executive
officers. In May, 2006, we announced that our President and Chief Executive Officer, D.
Linn Wiley intends to retire on December 31, 2006 as President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company and the Bank assuming a suitable replacement has been identified by such
time. The loss of the services of any one of our key executives or other executives or
our inability to find suitable replacements, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
In October 2001, the Companys board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to
2.0 million shares (all share amounts will not be adjusted to reflect stock dividends and
splits) of the Companys common stock. This program does not have an expiration date.
There were no repurchase transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2006. As of
March 31, 2006, 775,163 shares are available to be repurchased in the future under this
repurchase plan.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not Applicable
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not Applicable
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not Applicable
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit 31.1 Certification of D. Linn Wiley pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
44
Exhibit 31.2 Certification of Edward J. Biebrich, Jr. pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of D. Linn Wiley pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Edward J. Biebrich, Jr. pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
45
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CVB FINANCIAL CORP.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 8, 2006
|
|
/s/ Edward J. Biebrich Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward J. Biebrich Jr.
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
46
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, D. Linn Wiley, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CVB Financial Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 8, 2006 |
/s/ D. Linn Wiley
|
|
|
D. Linn Wiley |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Edward J. Biebrich, Jr, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CVB Financial Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 8, 2006 |
/s/ Edward J. Biebrich, Jr.
|
|
|
Edward J. Biebrich, Jr. |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of CVB Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, D. Linn Wiley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge that:
|
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 8, 2006 |
/s/ D. Linn Wiley
|
|
|
D. Linn Wiley |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
exv32w2
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of CVB Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Edward J. Biebrich, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge that:
|
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 8, 2006 |
/s/ Edward J. Biebrich Jr.
|
|
|
Edward J. Biebrich Jr. |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|